Archive

Posts Tagged ‘truth’

The Art of Being Poor

April 12, 2012 11 comments

So this is the deal, folks: I lost my job in fall 2009, and my unemployment benefits ran out at the end of February.

Difficulties pursue me as I try to keep everything in one piece: my apartment, utilities, social network…

As I wrestle with this latest episode of self-definition, I sometimes think of what Jane Jacobs has to say in her great book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities: life is not a work of art. It’s a difficult message for someone who’s an artist, but it reminds me that stuff left over from earlier in my life–i.e., unfinished homework–needs attending to.

And in the meantime, being poor has its lessons to teach, starting with discipline, which I take to mean recognizing and focusing on your unfinished business and living with challenges that might teach me humility and respect–taking a box of charity canned goods home, considering which church-sponsored meal might be ok to attend, trying to plan a career, instead of just taking a job. Wondering what happiness might mean for me…

We need time to process, and we are always getting older…if you’ve got what you need, you know it; if you don’t, find the courage to claim the things you need.

So life is not a work of art, but we need to make *some* sense out of it…like looking at a Pollack drip-painting, there is method (and beauty) in the madness.        RT

*

Photo: Budget Hotels in Tokyo; WikiCmns; CC 3.0 Unported; Author: Kounso.

Music of the Spheres

January 13, 2012 1 comment

&

It’s been a while since I’ve been on NASA’s Cassini webpageCassini, the NASA/ESA spacecraft that hove into orbit around Saturn in 2005 and started sending back mind-blowing images of the planet and its moons. First, it launched the Huygens space-probe, which successfully landed on the surface of Titan, Saturn’s largest moon, sending back amazing images along the way and from the surface (postcards from a billion miles away), then it started photographing the planet and its other moons, discovering four new moons, Methone, Pallene, Polydeuces, and  Daphnis, as it went about its work. Cassini has also mapped the surface of Titan–the second largest moon in the solar system–with cameras designed to penetrate Titan’s thick, smoggy atmosphere.

And then it discovered the ice geysers on the moon Enceladus.

Whoa! Let’s give the probe an A+ for achievement. So, at some point, I figured the fireworks were over, Cassini had sent back all the amazing data it could.

Wrong! The photo above, taken in May 2011, is as fine as any image the spacecraft has sent us so far. Who knows what else we may discover before the batteries run out on this mission. I’ll do my best to keep you posted.       RT

&

Photograph: Saturn’s Moons Titan and Dione Seen Against the Planet’s Rings. NASA website. NASA-JPL. Public Domain w/ attribution.

Jacob’s Sons: The Bible and the Z Revolution, Part 3

October 18, 2011 Leave a comment

At first glance, the birth-order of Jacob’s sons, the Twelve Patriarchs, might not seem important to deciphering the mysteries of the Elohist and the evolution of the Bible. After all, the Bible gives a clear account of the births, setting the stage for the struggle between Joseph and his brothers. But what if Genesis preserves a listing of the births that reports Joseph wasn’t the next-to-last son (and that Benjamin wasn’t Jacob’s youngest)? In fact it does, in Chapter 46, a passage that Richard Friedman attributes to the P author. And what if not one, but two other birth-orders can be discerned–the J birth-order (in Chapter 49) and the original E birth-order (a product of RT’s readings of Genesis and Exodus. And btw, what if Joseph had a second wife? RT thinks he might have–but that’s a topic for a later B&ZR posting). Could it have been that the birth-order (and everything else to do with the 12 Patriarchs) was a matter of burning religious and political concern to the E, J, and P authors? And just what was the P story of the births (a lost account implied by the survival of his list of the births)? Pesky questions to be sure, but perhaps worth pursuing. Anyway, here are the birth lists:

A. The “E” Birth-Order

Leah’s Older Sons

1. Reuben

2. Simeon

Bilhah’s Sons

3. Dan

4. Naphtali

Zilpah’s Sons

5. Gad

6. Asher

Leah’s Younger Sons

7. Isaachar

8. Zebulon

Rachel’s Sons

9. Joseph

10. Benjamin

Born in Egypt

11. Judah

12. Levi

B. The “J” Birth Order

Leah’s Sons

1. Reuben

2. Simeon

3. Levi

4. Judah

5. Zebulon

6. Issachar

Bilhah’s First Son

7. Dan

Zilpah’s Sons

8. Gad

9. Asher

Bilhah’s Second Son

10. Naphtali

Rachel’s Sons

11. Joseph

12. Benjamin

C. The “P” Birth-Order

Leah’s Sons

1. Reuben

2. Simeon

3. Levi

4. Judah

5. Isaachar

6. Zebulon

Zilpah’s Sons

7. Gad

8. Asher

Rachel’s Sons

9. Joseph

10. Benjamin

Bilhah’s Sons

11. Dan

12. Naphtali

Notice the place where the lists match: Reuben and Simeon are the first two sons in every list. And the same sons are attributed to the same mothers throughout. Why were Reuben and Simeon so important?   RT

Painting: Jacob and Rachel; Joseph Tissot; WikiCmns; Public Domain.

Ferrofluid!

August 21, 2011 2 comments

A ferrofluid is a carrier fluid in which magnetically sensitive particles have been suspended. This image was selected as a Wikimedia Picture of the Day on 9 November 2006. Author: Gregory F. Maxwell. Licence: GNU Free Documentation Licence 1.2 only.

Amazing!

Chief Gall, Sioux Chief

August 14, 2011 5 comments

*

Chief Gall, a Sioux Indian who fought at the Battle of Little Big Horn under Sitting Bull. Taken by D.F. Barry in the 1880s. The full story is at WikiCommons. A powerful portrait, an important moment in American history. (photo: Public Domain).

Semantics: Can You Make it Sting Some More?

June 26, 2011 12 comments

The Dragons of Grammar have been restive lately, sending out long plumes of smoke from their remote, rocky caves; making the occasional exploratory flight around the islands that they inhabit; sending me little love notes scratched on the back of any handy rock; and generally wanting to know why I’ve forgotten them.

Well, man does not live by blog alone, and the real world (American style) has been intruding on my thoughts of late. Prescription costs, much overdue maintenance on my apartment, and some trekking about in the thankfully cool Spring to meet old friends are among the items that have kept my attention elsewhere; so, I offer apologies to my scaly coterie!

And in particular, there’s that multifarious beast called Semantics, which is the study of meaning in signifiers, which include words, phrases, signs, and symbols.

1) In the context of the humble word, for instance, semantics draws the distinction between denotation and connotation–between a word’s literal meaning and the emotions and other meanings that the word suggests (and please note, this is a distinction understood by poets practically from the moment of birth ;) ).

In other words, a word is never just a word, but a group of meanings and feelings triggered by a principle meaning. Or we could say that a word, once learned, does not remain static, but grows as we acquire its cultural associations and individual emotional responses to its use. One way to understand this is to think of how an acupuncture point works–my acupuncturist having pointed out to me on more than one occasion that there is no single point that she aims for, but an area about the size of quarter. You know you’ve hit pay dirt, she says, when the patient says, “Gee, that stings! Can you make it sting some more?”

Let’s look at this simile more closely. Suppose that when we learn a new word, we do not activate a single neuron, but a cluster of neurons. At the center is the neuron(s) containing the principle word; surrounding it are neurons that will contain closely related words. For example, a principle word might be “big,” and associated words, “large,” “giant,” “great,” “important,” and “formidable.” Thus, when a person hears any of these words, the entire cluster of meanings is stimulated.

We can say more. The needle of meaning also triggers an emotional response. Somehow, the cluster of a word’s meanings is associated with more basic emotions. I can imagine our meaning neurons lying on top (and perhaps grows out) of the primordial emotion neurons–which in turn may lie on top of even more primordial neurons associated with action. Thus, words can be seen as the topmost board of a game of 3-D chess (Mr. Spock will win the game, of course).

For instance, a person hears the word “bully.” A cluster of meanings is triggered, most negative, but which may include Teddy Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party. Depending on how much you’ve been thinking about early 20th Century American politics lately, the word may frighten you and perhaps stimulate a “fight or flight” response. Wow!

2) Then there is the issue of the way that meanings (denotations, in this case) relate to the sounds that represent them: a) homonyms (same sound, different meanings, as in row the boat and a row of cars in a parking lot); b) synonyms (different sounds, same meaning, as in “buy” or “purchase” the tomatoes); and c) antonyms (opposite and mutually exclusive meanings, such as male and female). And how about that curious critter, metaphor, in which one idea simply stands for another, as in “grasp your meaning.”

3) I won’t hide from you the fact that semantics can be a rather abstruse dragon, often bent over a book with its reading glasses perched neatly near its eyes ; its remit includes such daunting concepts as parsing (the diagramming of sentences in natural languages); truth values (the relationship of a proposition to truth); and thematic relations  (the role that a noun phrase plays in regard to the verb in its sentence).  But it is best to remember that semantics is above all a gentle creature, which easily yields up its mysteries and meanings…and invites further explorations of the amazing assortment of ways that sound and meaning interact.

*

OK, team leader RT admits to being a wee bit tired at the moment–it’s time to bring our visit to rocky locales to a close for the day. But have no fear, though we’ve explored many of the amazing beasts associated with grammar, there are still more to come. Stay tuned!  

**

Photo: Chinese Barefoot Doctor Performing Acupuncture; author, D. Henrioud, World Health Organization; WikiCmns; Public Domain.

You Are Here

Specular Reflection on Saturn's moon, Titan

This is the first photo taken of specular reflection–the reflection of sunlight by a liquid surface–on Titan, Saturn’s largest moon (and the second largest moon in the Solar System). The liquid surface in question is Kraken Mare, a lake of liquid ethane and methane 150,000 square miles in size.

The photo seems appropriate for a moment of symmetry like the approaching Vernal Equinox. And Daylight Savings starts at midnight today–don’t forget to set your clocks an hour forward!

Photo: NASA/JPL; WikiCommons; Public Domain.

Policeman to the World?

March 9, 2011 2 comments

Libyan Uprising

*

Have we been here before? Another country recently on the edge of our attention is being torn by civil war. The head of state, installed as a result of a military coup decades ago, is the target of a large-scale uprising on the part of his own people. The government possesses unquestioned military power; the rebels, whatever forces they can cobble together. Control of one of the world’s largest reserves of oil is at stake. Should we intervene?

The situation in Libya does not parallel the circumstances of Bosnia in the 1990s or of Iraq back in 2003, but the issue of intervention is only too familiar. Are we policeman to the world?

I feel a lot more comfortable saying “yes” when the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is involved. Now it is not just the United States, but much of the western world that must pass judgment and sacrifice blood and treasure if necessary.

But Libya is part of the Muslim community; what right do we in the secular/Christian west have to intervene? Well, as it turns out, NATO may be better suited to the job than you might think. Though the alliance is mainly composed of European countries, its membership includes Turkey, a Muslim nation. So we are on firmer ground from a religious/cultural viewpoint if NATO does intervene in Libya.

But let’s not kid ourselves: if NATO is to serve as policeman to at least much of the world, its culture and other characteristics are still unquestionably European. For instance, the alliance is providing essential service in Afganistan, but what in the world does Afghanistan have to to do with the North Atlantic?

Maybe it’s time to redefine the role and identity of NATO, which was founded after WWII to defend western Europe. Now the Soviet Union is gone, and NATO comprises 28 member nations, not the original 12. Could we possibly expand the alliance still further to include members clearly outside the bounds of Europe and North America?

Some candidates come immediately to mind: Australia, Japan, Russia. Of course, incorporating these countries would make clear to all the global nature of the alliance’s defense mission. Here are some tougher choices: Mexico, Brazil, Nigeria, South Africa–countries with histories of political strife and instability, governed by fragile democracies. On the other hand, the Baltic states, Romania, and Bulgaria (all of which have a history of political strife) are NATO members, and everything seems to be well with them so far.

What would the mission of such an expanded NATO be? 1) To protect the territorial integrity of member nations and 2) to increase the political stability of the regions that member nations are located in.

And what about a new name for the alliance? The Global Peace and Security Organization? Pretty lame, I admit. But at the same time truer to NATO’s emerging mission.     RT

*

Photo. Src: WikiCmns; Author:

  http://www.taghribnews.ir/vdcjtmet.uqehaz29fu.html;License: CC 3.0 Unported.

The Heart Asks

February 26, 2011 2 comments

Emily Dickinson, inscrutable or not, has been on my mind lately. She is the author of some of my favorite poems, but I’ve been making my way through her work slowly over the years. Maybe it’s time to read a good biography. Anyway, here is one of her best:

*

 

The Heart Asks

 •

The heart asks pleasure first
And then, excuse from pain;
And then those little anodynes
That deaden suffering,

And then to go to sleep
And then, if it should be,
The will of its Inquisitor
The liberty to die!

Emily Dickinson

Photo: Week-end Pleasure, Lili Melo, France. WikiCmns, CC2.0.

Mark and Peter: Origins of the First Gospel

February 19, 2011 8 comments

page from the Gospel of Peter

*

In a field as fractious as the history of the Gospels, it is always noteworthy when scholars reach consensus on a question. Such a consensus has emerged concerning the priority of the gospel of Mark: just about everyone agrees that it was the first of the New Testament gospels to be written. This consensus rests mainly on the fact that the gospels of Matthew and Luke each contains almost all of Mark, strongly suggesting that the authors of these gospels used Mark as a source for their texts.

There is also broad agreement about the date that Mark was written: around the year 70 A.D., when the Romans took Jerusalem at the end of the first Roman-Jewish War and destroyed Herod’s Temple. This date is based on Jesus’ prediction of the destruction of the Temple in Mark 13 and the gospel’s sense of impending persecution, which might refer to Nero’s persecution of Christians.

Finally, there is agreement, though not as widespread, that the account handed down by the church fathers concerning the origins of Mark is essentially true: Mark was a disciple of Peter’s in Rome, and he based his gospel on the recollections and teachings of Peter.

*

But some scholars disagree. They place the author of Mark in Syria in about 70 A.D.; they see Palestinian as well as Roman influences in the gospel. And there are other, more perplexing reasons to question this gospel’s origins:

1) The author of Mark may have been more familiar with the geography of Palestine than is usually supposed. Two often cited geographical errors in Mark’s gospel (and there are others) apparently indicate that the author was unfamiliar with Palestine. One occurs after the story of the Syro-Phoenician woman–Jesus is supposed to have returned from Tyre via Sidon to Galilee. But Sidon lay to the north of Tyre, in the wrong direction. By way of explanation, one can say that Jesus may have had work to do in Sidon before returning to Galilee, and the story of his time in Sidon has been edited out. More mysterious is Mark’s claim that Jesus, on his way from Jericho to Jerusalem, passed through first Bethphage and then Bethany–when he would actually have passed through Bethany and then Bethphage. If Matthew was able to spot the error and correct it in his gospel, why weren’t people other than Mark (and above all, Peter) able to correct the error at the time of the gospel’s composition? Could it be that Mark used sources other than Peter for his gospel?

2) A gospel that claims to be Peter’s own report has been discovered. In the late 19th century, a copy of the lost Gospel of Peter was found in a monk’s grave in Egypt. Though the first half of the gospel is missing, the second half is intact (the ending is also missing) and gives an account of Jesus’ death quite different in certain respects from the one contained in Mark’s gospel. (GPtr is told in the first person, from Peter’s point of view.) Which version of the Passion might have originated with Peter in Rome? Did either?

3) The early church did not accept Mark’s gospel. The clearest indication of this is the incorporation of almost all of Mark in the gospels of Matthew and Luke. The intent here seems to have been to remove Mark’s gospel from circulation and replace it with the true version.

Another indication is the fact that the end of the gospel of Mark is missing. Two endings, one long, one short, were subsequently crafted to provide a powerful close, but the original text seems to be lost. Why would the early church reject Peter’s account of the gospel, even to the point of removing the story’s dramatic conclusion?

4) Recently, a letter by the church father Clement, which claims to record “secret” passages from the Gospel of Mark that were removed from the gospel’s “public” version, has been discovered. In 1958, a handwritten copy of this letter was discovered by Morton Smith on the end papers of a 17th century book while Smith was doing research at the Monastery of Mar Saba. The book has not been available for examination for many years and may be lost, raising the possibility of a hoax. But many scholars, basing their opinion on photographs of the letter and handwriting analysis, believe the copy of the letter in the endpapers to be genuine. As if this were not enough, Clement’s letter claims that there was a third version of Mark’s gospel in circulation. Which of these versions originated with Mark? Were there yet other emended copies?

*

It might look like these questions will never be answered. But the slow, patient, and sometimes courageous work of scholars over decades and even centuries is helping us answer them.

**

Photographer: H.B. Swete, 1893. WikiCmns; Public Domain.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 229 other followers